Senator Salaries Slashed: A Response
I write the following opinion piece as a concerned student, not as a senator, as I cannot represent SGA on this matter.
Facing the dire prospect of exhausting the Student Government Association (SGA) funds before 2026, the SGA enacted its first wage cuts for the 2024/25 academic year. Even with these wage cuts, the SGA projections (assuming all else stays constant) show SGA depleting its funds within 3 years. This situation is unacceptable. The Student body needs to be aware of the financial situation facing the SGA and its potential impact on the student body.
SGA spends significantly more money every semester than it gets from the student activity fee. SGA had a huge surplus of funds due to COVID, when SGA still received revenue from the student activity fee but could not utilize any of it.
The SGA is committed to addressing this issue, and has passed a resolution to establish a balanced budget by the end of the academic year. While I am confident the SGA can achieve this, the path and exact methods to do so still need to be worked out.
The first people to be impacted were SGA members. Senator Jimy said in person, and in his Quindecim opinion piece that he felt that SGA pay should be eliminated entirely. While I disagree with this approach, I thought it was important that the SGA consider it as an option. Treasurer Schaefer-Canner modeled this option in his projections. His analysis indicated that eliminating SGA pay would result in net income for SGA.
Goucher and its student body benefit from compensating SGA members for their time and effort, as it enables more inclusive participation, particularly from those who might otherwise be unable to contribute their time for financial reasons. For many, these financial incentives allows them to commit the necessary time to serve within SGA, and ensure their diverse voices are heard. It is probable that the wage cuts will reduce the diversity of SGA. This in an equity issue to make sure more people’s voices are heard.
With 31 current senators, 3 of those also being committee co-chairs, and capacity for up to 32 senators, a significant chunk of the SGA budget was used on senators despite the minimal hours and pay. I have been informed that this group is the most engaged, diverse, thoughtful senates of late. I believe this is in part due to the pay, and partially due to the current SGA executive board’s efforts to have diverse voices in SGA and Goucher at large.
In addition to Senators, there was a cut to the entire executive branch’s pay and/or hours. This area is likely where significant future cuts will be made.
I agree with the argument that if SGA transitions into an all-volunteer organization, less work will be done, and what little will be done will be done slower. Very few, if any, students have the time and energy to commit 10-20 hours a week for a volunteer position, given academics, club, additional jobs, and other obligations. The talent pool for SGA executive board could shrink significantly. Personally, even as someone passionate about being a voice for students, wanting to assist clubs, organize events/programs, and everything else, it would be hard committing to 20 hours of unpaid labor per week. There are too many other opportunities offering pay or credit, while still providing the fulfilment of making positive impacts on Goucher and beyond.
That being said, I am a realist. SGA has limited funds and should not operate unsustainably. Future cuts in other areas may have a worse impact on the SGA and the Goucher community.
The Textbook Assistance Program, Aunt Flow, and the transportation assistance program are all programs currently provided by the SGA for the student body. These key programs make up a smaller, but still significant portion of the SGA budget. I am against cuts to these programs, but the SGA faces a serious challenge.
SGA has a bunch of smaller miscellaneous costs that I think can be reduced or removed. The biggest of these is the cost of the SGA website. The SGA is estimated to pay $1,800 a year for web services. This should be cut to zero and just put under the larger (free) Goucher website.
SGA is also exploring ways to increase its revenue streams. SGA currently receives $100 per semester from each (non-GPEP) Goucher undergraduate student as part of the $250 student activity fee. The amount obtained from this varies with the student population. The executive branch is looking into raising money from alumni. While I hope that this initiative is successful, we should look for more avenues of revenue generation, to ensure we have the funds to maintain and grow SGA programs, clubs, and student advocacy efforts.
The budgets for most Registered Student Organizations (RSOs) including all student clubs, currently come from SGA and amount to approximately $40,000 a year. I believe supporting clubs is one of the most important tasks of SGA, but with a large percentage of SGA’s money going to clubs, I fear potential cuts. Next year there will be serious discussions about restructuring club budgeting and the way in which SGA distributes money to clubs. This is an opportunity to create a better system for clubs to meet their needs or potentially end up in a precarious system.
I agree with Jimy Kuhn that giving more money to the Quindecim (possibly to be used to pay student reporters) would be a great idea, but it is not possible within our current structure, which limits clubs to a budget of no more than $2,600 a year. Such a change could improve Goucher journalism. The Q is one of several clubs where more money would have a huge impact.
Perhaps some version of the club council may return. SGA should keep the current spread-out system of club budgeting and never return to one-day decision making. However, bringing in more club leadership voices and other student voices remain necessary in our evolving SGA financing system.
I believe that we need to consider a reorganization of SGA and that the SGA executive branch could and should do more to distribute SGA’s workload. Our current senators are underutilized; and having processes so more SGA members are prepared to step up into executive positions is important. Having spoken with Treasurer Schaefer-Canner, I understand his role is important, yet hard to delegate. He has begun creating a document listing his roles, responsibilities, and advice to help his successor. I hope other SGA leaders follow his example, ensuring a smooth transition to future administrations.
Transparency is important in these deliberations. In terms of transparency our current SGA tries its best, almost everything is posted on our website. This is still a work in progress. All of SGA’s general assemblies are open to all Goucher students. SGA’s Communications Director runs the SGA’s Instagram page. Other student outreach programs are in development. Most of the SGA’s executive branch have office hours students should utilize; this is a resource on campus that serves the student body.
The general assembly has discussed how SGA held over $120,000 in covid surplus, and decided to spend it to kickstart SGA and student engagement post Covid. However, this led to a financially unstable system being created. The SGA pay system was mostly established under the controversial leadership of President Ty’lor Schnella. In a prior Quindecim article interview, he said that “GSG (a previous version of SGA) is interesting in that every 2-3 years it implodes… …This is detrimental to the success and continuity of the organization, and consequently, the student voice on campus.” I am worried SGA will follow this pattern, so I would like to work towards a smooth transition to a better system within the framework of SGA that does not “implode” every few years.
It is important to have a thoughtful, responsible SGA President and Vice President especially in light of the power they hold. The voters in our 2025 SGA election should think of the responsibility these offices hold and pick representatives we can trust to serve the whole student body.
By Max Ravnitzky, ’28